From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58245207EC for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 16:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933777AbcI3QQc (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:16:32 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:54572 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933082AbcI3QQa (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:16:30 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453D6402AC; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:16:29 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Bf9/ELZQzBU9vQ6X94Voz73YHGY=; b=NkF5EG Q526WCPlkbtcx847jV9oRKja9fNXnP4TuhZYkEE7wpfn/p5JA/PVyMFBSEVDrEre 25P2YxcOAGnC6YrBLEHZ35TRfI7DL9wf5suLgXNhjAFoBwYWMUKhu2TJgNGhLEZR mg8egLbGHYuXzN19FJRuWy6kuHSIgSNvo9OV4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=vuHMvXgXaBa9tC+PHM9byf49JiT8BD4N nlqnSnLa3HZBKJCNRhLodKhlwbn/8FcCqT4pQr4YAtODhTHBxg9bpGGKcQaC+4DZ GhQKDfYNVAvZ5mRrV5HDGMELCUMSWemxCYjrRAtKqQkjW2/uRIZWzo7uOucQw8Z0 JBiRSeXJ3s0= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2EE402A9; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:16:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8C69402A7; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:16:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Michael J Gruber Cc: Ramsay Jones , git@vger.kernel.org, Alex Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpg-interface: use more status letters References: <24ecc903-3e5a-47f6-f073-00a1c709d5e8@ramsayjones.plus.com> <85fa6296-17f0-0e8c-ec1b-54cd48c45223@drmicha.warpmail.net> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 09:16:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <85fa6296-17f0-0e8c-ec1b-54cd48c45223@drmicha.warpmail.net> (Michael J. Gruber's message of "Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:41:11 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3E3347B8-8729-11E6-8AC6-C26412518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Michael J Gruber writes: > Also, I'm open to using another letter for EXPKEYSIG but couldn't decide > between 'Y', 'Z', 'K'. 'K' could be confused with REVKEYSIG, I'm afraid. > 'Y' is next to 'X' and contained in 'KEY', it would be my first choice. Sounds good enough to me. Thanks.