From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAB41F4F8 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 21:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753211AbcJEVnX (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2016 17:43:23 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:62075 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751020AbcJEVnW (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2016 17:43:22 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95633442E4; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 17:43:21 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=p1N9T9rRQzncy+a0RgPiBBeO59w=; b=W/yKR+ mV7WO2bjvE34uanWTvqyJUVvscAoENmObsTPVMmo/6Q3GaVttoL8GXyB0Joc8E1g 6zEJ+pVT/F+8VEsScUapfvd2WxfiR4FFxIZlTQGlprlnBEdKLhpK+GDGsBY418Z1 6VfdSTSkzEnf5VpAjr9awI8QJ3t4AYiynEqBM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=OQmUeAZU6QsuKFF/J48UslAGlkkMGEr3 EYLnwhTpaTf1Lzq/kI8m+rXtJp3ivC0o76LHf0q7tmAwK3ZAmDQ+DZ6qocYCC2xV Ayvwo/knkV+YX0CPChGSPNq2FG+Pw+I8qSNwBM5Yg/j6+XXVHdJH+gdb96eQXb4G opztjPqTKRQ= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1A8442E3; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 17:43:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D9DC442E2; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 17:43:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Sergey Organov Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Documentation/git-merge.txt: get rid of irrelevant references to git-pull References: <87shsapjiz.fsf@javad.com> Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:43:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87shsapjiz.fsf@javad.com> (Sergey Organov's message of "Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:34:28 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BC1184A0-8B44-11E6-915C-F99D12518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Sergey Organov writes: > So I believe this change is inline with the rest of the patch. The > reference to git-pull (if it remains) should be a side-note, not part of > explanation of operation. Not really. The thing is, "This is the most common" needs to be close to "Often...". "git merge" directly invoked by the end user is much less likely to encounter a fast forward situation; getting invoked indirectly by "git pull" makes it common.