From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB9420D09 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 02:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751242AbdFECEc (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jun 2017 22:04:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:36231 "EHLO mail-pg0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751230AbdFECEb (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jun 2017 22:04:31 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id a70so6208740pge.3 for ; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 19:04:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=EqB67fELr2+qE36wo1KZThvc5qdNPueeZy6IhElBW0w=; b=dNLhvyTMoypBKoxKAshdFH6D3FR3blXXFUnPbYMTEwgde7MzRB7tubSar0tsJS3hh0 SpfHcnayFgYgLp1YA2QepbglDyrTEPHt0pjOEliRmEBgKpgsUUNYKVipbsf18GqTGB7P LaanD5RodP5TkZ3Y+UwBb1/xDWFmKZUSVN1rfjBeyLTrbsAyANud/lO7yYycScJXUb/T U4q+z9dFUf6rHazw8kfdxCSWDZx5T04MOo+w4hVoq+31yTM/Nekwi25P3oG6saIUnAQI 4vcdJ3hJhndJvyQCebOxsi6VYpPegxKUq6DwhLi0K3yy+EJqHSdAp019csMauD9uKrxp vPDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=EqB67fELr2+qE36wo1KZThvc5qdNPueeZy6IhElBW0w=; b=tZECGaJ6Ci5IXv7qFv14TV7qzePnzninr8nKizNVy03Fw2g+EdFCTI/05I9vlDnDIN /ilkrkTIiqi2K5ZD+eOJCplfoyaFGWUVp3Ntxy1KIZgFKSYCWrV0nzCHw1U8KwwxaXcj GSqNg3Zz6tgHmguK2gf+Cv2elxEm23qUY2svv1oxV+zHHt1L5gZODAZu5S/1NFuBuAtv HHujMWuqDPaguViBFP21aFSZjmgh6T/B3W63jERwcnj9IFI3fWYDoJ/5pymGsOT1CPi6 /7F76QUkenl9XctigjP0+0wo5kPEvCQ0mGZn0sFz8CPpxfFhIMnR/818MaEuj+s731sl QhmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcApXM+eV1qOERmm79BSe6j68Z7Vjmptw/1H2EsWIybxeS4Ua38w ta58YfcZp5fX/g== X-Received: by 10.84.236.15 with SMTP id q15mr12260564plk.163.1496628270316; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 19:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:0:1000:8622:a83a:973:bb14:324a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u73sm11779746pgb.24.2017.06.04.19.04.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Jun 2017 19:04:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: work around the tested repo having an index.lock References: <20170602103330.25663-1-avarab@gmail.com> <20170602184506.x2inwswmcwafyvfy@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170604082919.y5g34udvyjfaqtve@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 11:04:29 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20170604082919.y5g34udvyjfaqtve@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sun, 4 Jun 2017 04:29:19 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > I don't really mind addressing this one case that much. I'm not sure > that we want to accrue a pile of band-aids here that causes a > maintenance burden and doesn't really solve the problem completely. One > way to do that is to say no to the first band-aid. Yup, that was where my objection came from. > But we could also > apply it and see what happens. At the very worst it's a few extra lines > of code, and we can start to get worried on the second or third > band-aid. That's OK as well. But we should resolve now that we will rip all of them out once we start seeing the second or third band-aid. I really do not want to see the "accring a pile of band aids" in our future.