From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199CA2047F for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 18:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751748AbdHGSSj (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:18:39 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:62503 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751426AbdHGSSj (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:18:39 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC129CD08; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:18:38 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=lK3d4KLHvbmKJGOMbCbYNQUBAHk=; b=BLFTVu +Yya5JzhD6lqiZ62Au8AwJndYXXgvGhhnMi+lYf2Su706CIafmEpPJL3tHCHXHFG YMrgI+UL3pYhech/kYGMudMZg4sV7GK7B2U31TH4shr+w2Mv3BS3VBJknQ8T+X5N aZogZfMB6zvMpKuigURuntMkDH4gbk/D8I1hg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=gP7fR4jtLloQrZqHgF8OZVNAGMDfB295 KNl7H7kthzJtZoJhvpOp+l9q3FKoyc9IWlzj8H3BfoZAPfUDAswcmwPIPffCx7yR Lwn/ykAdtA42SOw6MkKj5YREjlwvfTJm7Ao7T90+AxXMHhI2raNeHVj37ThwJChg xOW+5//nBe4= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FBF9CD07; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:18:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCDF09CD06; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:18:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Michael Forney Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drop some dashes from built-in invocations in scripts References: <20170805064905.5948-1-mforney@mforney.org> Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 11:18:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Michael Forney's message of "Mon, 7 Aug 2017 10:58:34 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D524ED80-7B9C-11E7-9CA9-9D2B0D78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Michael Forney writes: > However, I still think the patch should be applied for > self-consistency at least (git-submodule.sh currently calls both `git > rev-parse` and `git-rev-parse`). Oh, there is no question about the changes in the patch being good, as I already said. We want to make sure that people who copy & paste code would see fewer instances of "git-foo". I was commenting on the justification in your proposed log message, which I realized was a bit misleading, after deciding that the patch text itself is good and I need to apply it. Thanks for the clean-up.