From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E4E20372 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753301AbdJMAaH (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2017 20:30:07 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:64741 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752644AbdJMAaG (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2017 20:30:06 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E792A6761; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 20:30:05 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=GejsATQP1XX9axaKS1Y8n6zY9uM=; b=KAqNdq VJfFbXTnJzUiRZ+DMw25sWVFq0qO7eqWa0ZatUDi0/5ymBv6P10ELyZsKCp6mkSg mwgB/fzHGbX/j+0KliDwB4tKn8KGdoPp5eSGkucpR01SIkn5zFSEGds3cniMPztp B3tJij7SckJKRrbwASrsdgx5Uzc6VsMMzC3A0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ZHjYi+8eaE48w1DFFG4KaCJXvpNayNkA YWmfsE+gL5vJFwUBVqo0NSsfPQMfxMu5FnTHLN9vIe0iZRKOrSpUxXEp5uV1q+St GzDiBFeTiSKFLVYgg4jSosVBmBN8Qr6OSNFua0xQzHH7/OfcOTNPV5xMIYIencXO Y+DSFIvBePs= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9E8A675E; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 20:30:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6E3FA675A; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 20:30:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, J Wyman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] for-each-ref: let upstream/push optionally remote ref name References: <7da6c7e2563d14cb7cd7ff2637c79c51896a9788.1507205895.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:30:01 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Thu, 12 Oct 2017 21:13:40 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A754C1A6-AFAD-11E7-BB0B-8EF31968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: >> (The funny "squash!" followed by a complete version of the >> rewritten commit message is what I do until I -- or anybody else >> -- comes up with a patch to implement support for "reword!".) I have wished for something like that for a long time; it has been (and it still is) a bit unclear what the semantics and UI should look like, but still, such a feature would be quite useful.