From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD88F1F6A9 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 11:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727706AbfADL0C (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2019 06:26:02 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:35346 "EHLO mail-wm1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726404AbfADL0B (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2019 06:26:01 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id t200so909601wmt.0 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 03:25:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eIZVPgkjsgS6Mn66NDxLBtEkcEKe84r8d61Qhal3UZ8=; b=fAP7H3okv/ZhRva2wnChU0eDqnHg0LEPblJEZROhsb1L5SnUssl8GjpYtNF4IA/PqB aIviHMogU+3rwARCAbKJcbAZ9AnRdEFE8ylGIZr/xXUV/dUUB150lifRjDFt80D1FUSA OGqfD7yAFHIlsGSIkmcKQ+Xa0LRBfkjbnVH4X2BIRMJfBJShEORNKi4N0fVj52oegtVM hAA635+97ABZI2qf3FBBWNsKZQSFc+W8sSzjJShkwLOZlZrOiaFtd6gG9brd2A1KHpnO qqsuAYZKEPvqP0fz+gBfAGqbpl9wqqKPJNTd0zEsS5wB5uWFYXX63bjFrVvyseVmNoER T+fw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eIZVPgkjsgS6Mn66NDxLBtEkcEKe84r8d61Qhal3UZ8=; b=FI/LZbFaJ3Lcw4z4e6lhkZjTHHFN7xcK/5nwqmYl08VTLB4KY6vqInHVjkZkv9/Ywd snahEmqUGelGBjiGzoYn/ZOIZ3GZJoeC2XL/epqbvKAKLqmj+rTt3gbKOKzNyNgKqLAf oB4YyYYT9Xqz+wBLBqqtNwlpcx3vJNTQq39SbUL0Q8nOUN7lSm//nyQJ/Qr9l5o8RDX3 cmOCZt7NNILu9YHPlRu8Z8blgCY44oQQ7dxpgOH4TaHuI5kZdw7knTOf3jzBnBPEyAtw xn+g+H6SNJ/3oBWD2WsFUGKfmq8tydJjjhJ+cTQaJkxqo1VvDZJn4YUQqtJWxad8BPP4 WTnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeEaVENkH8wQKrdXHyQVfaXBlvLndIrFn5ONWcvd+BFvY3e072C GZBpdPQgxKN7rRsPvO5cXDSWS+Ba X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5NLTf9M1c1rmlIZNmwU5SH0A09VHBuHiWVH9pUsnZM/RUOmjeqHw+8kZvzplXF9GiVVf/ajA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c44d:: with SMTP id l13mr1078359wmi.144.1546601158930; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 03:25:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (168.50.187.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.187.50.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k7sm43345978wrl.51.2019.01.04.03.25.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 04 Jan 2019 03:25:58 -0800 (PST) From: Junio C Hamano To: SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Cc: Johannes Sixt , Max Kirillov , Carlo Arenas , Jeff King , Eric Sunshine , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] test-lib: check Bash version for '-x' without using shell arrays References: <20190103114317.11523-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com> <20190104093015.GC4673@szeder.dev> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 03:25:57 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20190104093015.GC4673@szeder.dev> ("SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1?= =?utf-8?Q?bor=22's?= message of "Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:30:15 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org SZEDER Gábor writes: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 12:29:35PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Let's treat this as an independent and more urgent fix-up. I think >> it is sufficient to apply it to 2.20.x track, even though we could >> go back to 2.17.x and above. >> >> And then let's tentatively kick the "stress test" series out of >> 'pu', and have that series rebuilt on top of 'master' and this >> patch. > > I rebased my '--stress' patch series on top of > 'sg/test-bash-version-fix', and the result is the same as what's at > the tip of 'sg/stress-test' at 1d1416a34b. Yeah, sorry for not reporting what I did after pushing the integration result out. I ended up rebasing the stress series on top of the updated fix with eval myself. Thanks.