From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6411F4B4 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2440761AbgJUUo1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:44:27 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:50322 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2440724AbgJUUo1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:44:27 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94FFFE3B2; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:44:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=qIyydt/UdbhA30qzn5n75wSHvVk=; b=cKn0Fz TEa3vN9Da/+8Y67dkLE/u206D1hsN1I8FbLhfhSYi79XujvB4aI+4lzF83XgkDRP BOp8SqzNW1dK8mN/sQ9hyBa8/C2FhIuQd2znEt47ZjyWWXX0OU2jwbwbOzLJE56p NiWtKdkzV85Asabuj5ovsHIV/CdxyzZimBvqI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=XELCfaL5EAzSHojVCAvxrHrL4/WyqjBm GjmCXwCJqaS5CrR5BvlShaqIEzB3CoKFzI1yR9RpTFmtITdsnhoW9kskNHZMqW3D Z/DxgdZTmFCi15ZTNN2RDi1sPgeTg3maIKuPCCict/8rHmtCvDB30xkwncwLCeOC NtFNiq/JaOg= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A1AFE3B1; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:44:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E885BFE3AF; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:44:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mr/bisect-in-c-3, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2020, #03; Mon, 19) References: Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:44:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:48:03 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3352D05C-13DE-11EB-9EAC-E43E2BB96649-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > Hi Junio, > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> * mr/bisect-in-c-3 (2020-10-16) 7 commits >> - bisect--helper: retire `--bisect-autostart` subcommand >> - bisect--helper: retire `--write-terms` subcommand >> - bisect--helper: retire `--check-expected-revs` subcommand >> - bisect--helper: reimplement `bisect_state` & `bisect_head` shell functions in C >> - bisect--helper: retire `--next-all` subcommand >> - bisect--helper: retire `--bisect-clean-state` subcommand >> - bisect--helper: finish porting `bisect_start()` to C >> >> Rewriting "git bisect" in C continues. >> >> How ready is this one? > > It has been reviewed _quite_ a couple of times over the course of 9 > iterations, and I think it is ready now. Oh, numbers I can count. I wanted to hear "yes, all previously known issues have been addressed" from those who did read everything in it and gave their feedback. Do you want to give your "reviewed-by" now? Thanks.