From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4241F4B4 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 01:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731588AbgLJBFG (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 20:05:06 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:58745 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731095AbgLJBE5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 20:04:57 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736941122D5; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 20:04:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=NWSYsCnECfA1K5Pr+7n29733oUg=; b=qTS4Cr TA+j8dXzF9iA6sCxJ/Ehh1EZ6DA3UBCGRznNzjlhyZK5rJFGEgjhHg/YMXZeN84b KPBc3/fhRICQ94Ru+HJ5Zp16bSDAQmKLJTac5tlS7MZcXUhOo9grEoQHrHGeSfJw 15fhXOyOIqilNlyMnY+dZCOotOpCnX8sesWeU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=j+EnPnzxrH+L0R0/FhkMirakE28nw8BX MTApJNCscrtts+wbm3b/iW3H92WpMlzL95aEDG/JjcE7sQBjsPXmOmRZIqsCVSmx 5zXPgOGxM7TDAVWy3eAtfp1cQjxnBalOrHrW3T0LkDrIZlG7xIneJQgU8kxTx8lv vty5ELGt7vE= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2591122D4; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 20:04:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B71EB1122D2; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 20:04:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Eric Sunshine Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , Git List , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Maintenance IV: Platform-specific background maintenance References: Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 17:04:12 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Eric Sunshine's message of "Wed, 9 Dec 2020 19:49:27 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9E67B1CA-3A83-11EB-B83C-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Eric Sunshine writes: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 7:33 PM Junio C Hamano wrote: >> "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" writes: >> > Update in V6 >> > ============ >> > >> > * The Windows platform uses the tempfile API a bit better, including using >> > the frequency in the filename to make the test simpler. >> >> Are two fix-up patches from Eric that have been queued near the top >> of ds/maintenance-part-4 still relevant? > > Both of the patches from Sunshine are still relevant atop Stolee's > latest (v6), and they should apply cleanly (I would think) since v6 > didn't change anything related to those patches. Yup, I tried rebasing these two and they applied cleanly, so I'll include them in today's pushout (which I haven't finished yet). I probably would not notice if the updated 4-patch series already solved the issue in another way without causing the textual conflict with your two fix-up patches, though ;-) Thanks.