From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D411F8C6 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229968AbhHKRVI (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 13:21:08 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:52827 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229590AbhHKRVG (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 13:21:06 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1D014235B; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 13:20:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=EyRAC6+NNpKw smsRU4x4CoFt9tP7NGOzOWVe3CPTNiA=; b=jaw78KfYvJZ0Cv3uYm177m/t6NA5 pRYovf1V0aRCRYYPPwgR6CP52llx46SM/wS1EGopiu/YWwjuTugH8A5q80Qg4AuL PCzYatNY7x52kRR+vR0IcyQcM0ABkwpHUA6lT2gaueaE+dIK/6CNhvTU5mJO/pak MWBAWYTNIgKdlts= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B682214235A; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 13:20:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.3.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 111B4142359; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 13:20:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe Cc: Carlo Arenas , git@vger.kernel.org, e@80x24.org, Andrzej Hunt Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] pedantic errors in next References: <20210809013833.58110-1-carenas@gmail.com> <0b973579-748e-ce2f-20aa-a967765cce83@web.de> <1a18a701-7d14-d6c5-6929-30636e688006@web.de> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 10:20:37 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1a18a701-7d14-d6c5-6929-30636e688006@web.de> (=?utf-8?Q?=22R?= =?utf-8?Q?en=C3=A9?= Scharfe"'s message of "Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:57:52 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 72C50F80-FAC8-11EB-AD84-FA9E2DDBB1FC-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Ren=C3=A9 Scharfe writes: >> would at least the two included in the chunks above be safe enough for >> RC2 as I hope?, is the one with the additional int too hacky to be >> considered for release?; > > I think your -pedantic fixes 1 and 2 should go into the next possible > release candidate because they fix regressions. I agree. They are at the bottom of 'seen' just above 'master' in last night's pushout for this exact reason. > Same for my signed-left-shift fix in > http://public-inbox.org/git/bab9f889-ee2e-d3c3-0319-e297b59261a0@web.de= / > (or some improved version if it's lacking in some way) and the yet to b= e > published fix for the alignment issue. I assume Andrzej as the reporte= r > or Eric as the original author would like to have a shot at the latter. Thanks. It was missed as it was buried in the discussion exchange. Will queue together with cb/many-alternate-optim-fixup topic.