From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC792034E for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 22:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754258AbcGTWWI (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:22:08 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:52235 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751656AbcGTWWH (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:22:07 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C372E364; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:22:05 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=U0m2jthwPS5nUovZJylXk/Dh56M=; b=W36FWe 8F7UWKsFxoGeuGSjnPJt6JdbVJCbGJZ8C0mOqGj+rJdq4wPD6Ab/hk4ZQH9glVVG xTChkwWuL4c+gubCq/9G5KubV9Z9Ah7WGiKF+b6I5fuANz49hR5WSSc/uLwzcs7j KZD6Jz4Gv88ulBisz7w6fiFDskRK99PxdtR3w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=MHfrdZLK9IOXMxylkswtVNW+0zZHtH9L nzJ4Wi/YYosm2C50z/rVTo2Q1ieYS/MCNBe8/UwG4tPYsxMUa0TuOLjid/qL9sSo 9MpZrUdo/H7VXLCllePX4OYR/Pyg+5rscQij37olfZEX81FN81IgpOFnq2eLG5y+ zmffw600uC0= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C132E360; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:22:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D95112E35F; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:22:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Philip Oakley Cc: GitList , Jeff King , Marc Branchaud , Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Nar=C4=99bski?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Name for A..B ranges? References: <20160711202518.532-1-philipoakley@iee.org> <20160720211007.5520-1-philipoakley@iee.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:22:02 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160720211007.5520-1-philipoakley@iee.org> (Philip Oakley's message of "Wed, 20 Jul 2016 22:09:59 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 635FE2D8-4EC8-11E6-AB69-89D312518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Philip Oakley writes: > No change in the number of patches. Interdiff below. > > The patches carefully tease out the clarification of > reachability. Reachability is defined relative the ancestry chain thus > (hopefully) avoiding misunderstandings. > > The final patch updates the summary examples, and the tricky (for the > untutored reader) two dots case of a linear development where r1..r2 > excludes r1 itself. All looked sensible and each focused on a single issue and fixing it well. Done very nicely. Thanks. Will (re)queue, wait for a few days for further comments and let's merge it to 'next'.