From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC4A1FA14 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751578AbdDNLMT (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Apr 2017 07:12:19 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:51762 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751305AbdDNLMS (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Apr 2017 07:12:18 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868BF6E661; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 07:12:11 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=p9UWMdpOZd2khdnc8XpzaqVThRU=; b=iTIZib U6HvCNEAIueTFUT0ykZ8bJlBievxelXfpuRFK0zNCkSEHNEZ1vLNt2AV5x3C9uyw KlaeQnVS3F4Xxjvec0rnDblvErJHnwsl/tiRQ8tXTBdioRqyhY3WnH47767/itm3 YpFIf6qppCzknShSYgxxWmz3aQgh1qLAfmUEA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Mpo42FkFgw41IxOpr1SohAuEg5cdeoKg rN74t8wdgChk4oJEOjqvs3t1cQzf0lN+OaWmZRHoJk+fhFF5XdSv90T9KSSqGXWn bEY1KMxw5SIMUdesQHJAVmIMPodL7U7SaQYMeZTx6Avc8GCcfkqrJlpBjiRiGaoj YgKt1jlxd2o= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1866E65F; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 07:12:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE5796E65E; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 07:12:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: "Tom G. Christensen" , git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: [RFC] dropping support for ancient versions of curl References: <20170404025438.bgxz5sfmrawqswcj@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170406092122.titsfyxpucj6xoe4@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170407045427.rqrqdt5mxzudonzo@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 04:12:09 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170407045427.rqrqdt5mxzudonzo@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 7 Apr 2017 00:54:27 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3490E8D6-2103-11E7-853C-C260AE2156B6-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > I think I'm leaning towards the very first patch I posted, that assumes > 7.11.0 and later. And then hold off on the others for a few years. In > terms of "number of ifdefs removed" we could go further, but I think it > was the first patch that removes a lot of the really questionable bits > (like silently ignoring security-related features). I do not have problems with setting cut-off at 7.11.0; I do not foresee anybody who actively maintains a port for a platform whose cURL is older than that version would step up ;-) Thanks.