From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E21202F2 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 03:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760848AbdKRDl6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:41:58 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:50383 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760716AbdKRDl4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:41:56 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36270BBA24; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:41:56 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=y7fHsDCJezU+4Mn8p9dHjFpZftI=; b=PVnCnT BuoosIJQu/RNE3C89yKpB2a0WtSHQTPFKoKGWsrDuh+sLrowJJjaKMAXUXl1/OlI qArBVhxOgClCY3WDbIY9MB7RffDh82Fg/zeGFx0gsV409JBErEJeXzUEp1zt8GfB dPP1QQ/HaOu+lCjR8UOgBiGl3n79WLrU69374= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=er483hBABg1JgH2u2uRJKdv4OTW4hkZ9 7znHsIsMy8sVfPlEDA8e3HqjLxLIhYV+p/iZz8H8S1Lo6reQAuF5dkbSOZ35BD3T 0fG0xTNBsT3Nop8RfrwTjD+0fMeDFUhTn0ev2J5ADQiqRgeHI3XvbDvrGNyugj6T AYJgB4/6Li8= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE21BBA23; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:41:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70963BBA22; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:41:55 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Phillip Wood Cc: Git Mailing List , Johannes Schindelin , Phillip Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] sequencer: don't fork git commit References: <20170925101041.18344-1-phillip.wood@talktalk.net> <20171117113452.26597-1-phillip.wood@talktalk.net> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:41:54 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20171117113452.26597-1-phillip.wood@talktalk.net> (Phillip Wood's message of "Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:34:44 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6C31E3DE-CC12-11E7-86BD-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Phillip Wood writes: > From: Phillip Wood > > I've updated these based on the feedback for v2. I've dropped the > patch that stopped print_commit_summary() from dying as I think it is > better to die than return an error (see the commit message of the > patch that adds print_commit_summary() for the reasoning). Apart from > that they're minor changes - style fixes and a reworded a commit message. Thanks for further polishing this topic; I found nothing in the update that was questionable. Will replace. With this, perhaps it is ready for 'next'?