From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AA71F4B5 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727399AbfKTAhS (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:37:18 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:59196 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727222AbfKTAhS (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:37:18 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2457C95D13; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:37:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=j5rZDnesQmCqrlzwflxqa13Qang=; b=OSDDWo aC7NVy/gWajR7Ypv8eCZ12YVhHk8zcHvmyJOK8BWQzwMWlhuoIGZkADMmgi+H28h FlnTpubz4LSNXBodhxW+q6F1s57alRZOLHiEQxf7N3C/fnW2aNC78QfhSPQVWQQu TWmDyRgTzdO4GGjGgmWQ/6PvfUTAxWWEydrsU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qilCUE5XyIUfTGFCqhxT0YFxyIvR2tUU 4VSTtkUoH5vWMOPdJQRreITtpF1NEHDEgkmlGxvc3/nAxhcHoDacFTaOkQOxCMcB X9G1iXxtfvzmfjeXXg6+PgkcTjbBeUtyVgS/rjyDPI9udqzYuegph6/lOt+QwIdL 4YmKZZvBoGw= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C45795D12; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:37:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A6E195D11; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:37:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Emily Shaffer , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] bugreport: add tool to generate debugging info References: <20191025025129.250049-1-emilyshaffer@google.com> <20191025025129.250049-2-emilyshaffer@google.com> <20191119202542.GB36377@google.com> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 09:37:11 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:24:44 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E517F1D8-0B2D-11EA-AD6C-8D86F504CC47-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > FWIW I disagree with the idea that a tiny built-in command like > `bugreport` would "bloat" the main `git` binary. > > In contrast, I think that stand-alone commands _do_ bloat. Look here: I probably should have clarified that "bloat" in the context of this discussion is not about on-disk space. It is about resources needed to run "git status/diff/etc" that are everyday local commands that are expected to be lightweight, i.e. the same criteria applied when making the networking part (which the user expects to be coffee time) separate from them.