From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1701F9E0 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 23:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726262AbgD0XQN (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:16:13 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:61976 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726233AbgD0XQN (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:16:13 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D5E4435E; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:16:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Holx5MbX5SJdtqicIeyKzig+YL8=; b=CXVaVU CaVaFbHu13lvrk5n+i8DFieJTnN80eKKc89BzK4fLwe0iy6L/8vdb202ePQh+V4L A69ctj3NnmzGv1gzH9laFWtPUap+8c5AHpb3ywlxKUeODzRKHudeApi/ajKPuT7L BQi0A1r1y75ATULMycYKr1DAfybpVyfwaI0BE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=nTZsx8pQHmZ/lJUE91FlssWIYnFvAWcx uIvKkbjbCKD6GFnoWkqe0bbbmPq2gvcS/HdTxve/3JTbl3uWuBxzgiewF3LQId7J GAlLlfYxIuRVi96pjZOPuuXQ3SsDcmaI4cKKfzujvQkBOE7SWYlc1eOUPZkaw7Jb GoWADveM3v4= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7264435D; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:16:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7125A4434A; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:16:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Elijah Newren Cc: Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin , Sibi Siddharthan , Sibi Siddharthan via GitGitGadget , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] CMake build system for git References: <20200427200852.GC1728884@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200427220955.GA1747507@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:16:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Elijah Newren's message of "Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:23:22 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 14C46FE2-88DD-11EA-AFA9-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Elijah Newren writes: >> If it lived in contrib/ that might strike a good balance between making >> it available for people to experiment with, but not having people >> confuse it for the official build system. If we declare cmake support is only for VS and throw it into somewhere like contrib/buildsystems, that may be good enough. > Maybe we could move configure.ac and config.mak.in into contrib as well? Perhaps.