From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36271F55B for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 23:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726309AbgFLXOu (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:14:50 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:62001 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726302AbgFLXOu (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:14:50 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E63DFC94; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:14:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=63ErJMM0wiNlCp5uBTGQ87Yyn/E=; b=Vfu1wI FIzwoBPW7B3WD/7nMeEVdM7KU+xCI+TEkhwrCrF90w7Ebza7ivt5md3fJOl8OZwT e55YvZhc4wPgZBSrcWEJVS5cT3sRymjLu6GXfsGxoFXHcacyk940bdrVEr8l9//P LtZK1bfFJLA6vuFfg74SLhYpYHJrBiP/MFk9I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=x1GigP6fKT97HO2a1j6fW10fARs6ulyV iqlJQv4Oh29seuOD2vSc9chT1YfQnPtyXCf72tM5IDfcqN+/8F+zlDhYGiJSt5Wd JeOrdGRmpv/9zBmqVlG+ktZHzqKzxmRcIL2CMGvBvptsmUXbEaLhKGLGbMxFaKiq x44DmfyyaKg= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6F5DFC93; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:14:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97117DFC92; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:14:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Denton Liu Cc: Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] GIT-VERSION-GEN: update for the post 2.27 cycle References: <4946cf3650b95191455630f85f59e5f93156d0ac.1591883410.git.liu.denton@gmail.com> <20200612005217.GA3964@generichostname> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 16:14:43 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200612005217.GA3964@generichostname> (Denton Liu's message of "Thu, 11 Jun 2020 20:52:17 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 81231082-AD02-11EA-846D-8D86F504CC47-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Denton Liu writes: > Thanks for the explanation, it makes sense. > >> Unfortunately, your patch does not say why, either, so it hasn't >> quite helped yet ;-) > > I tried looking on the list but I didn't find any mention about this > experiment so I assumed that you unintentionally forgot to update the > version. Good to know that it was done deliberately :) Well having said all that, I do not have a strong reason not to update it. Perhaps when the next batch of topics graduates and cause the release notes to be updated, I'll update it as well. Thanks.