From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1D61F8C8 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 21:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242888AbhI1Vbv (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:31:51 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:57352 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242867AbhI1Vbu (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:31:50 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBB1F3461; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:30:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=Xhxg2+QjXHSx PTn8fKZxCed9HJfBzSzbC/OgOVeuJfk=; b=fNGSqauV1ZJ5CEnSAC6jjAMgUrm9 GQ2d2sd8jDy/ifkX0EYZBklPQ2ZG7tHne4+3vJkmyIFQLshvMFJASDkbhb2+ytWs fhXmGS93Yx9P6wredYAMwbyUgBN8NQ5G0v5YeUA6v5D/zUyONldjqyMBbCzX1A3D +yLB2LTIiRdgS80= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9860AF3460; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:30:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA6E7F345C; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:30:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: Carlo Marcelo Arenas =?utf-8?Q?Bel=C3=B3n?= , git@vger.kernel.org, t.gummerer@gmail.com, pclouds@gmail.com, jonathantanmy@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] config.mak.dev: simplify compiler check for multiple compilers References: <20210928091054.78895-1-carenas@gmail.com> <20210928091054.78895-4-carenas@gmail.com> <87k0j0x5mg.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 14:30:02 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87k0j0x5mg.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFy?= =?utf-8?B?bmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Tue, 28 Sep 2021 14:07:09 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3F71E3B4-20A3-11EC-97D4-CD991BBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > Anyway, feel free to ignore the below, and I think it's certainly not > needed for this series, just my 0.02 if you're eventually refactoring > some of this. > > diff --git a/config.mak.dev b/config.mak.dev > index 0a87d8cbe9d..df27340b4b0 100644 > --- a/config.mak.dev > +++ b/config.mak.dev > @@ -2,6 +2,14 @@ ifndef COMPILER_FEATURES > COMPILER_FEATURES :=3D $(shell ./detect-compiler $(CC)) > endif > =20 > +# These are all the empty string if the compiler *isn't* X or > +# earlier. Note that clang v5, v6 etc. also qualify as "have v4". I had to read this three times and still cannot decide what it wants ot say. > +CC_HAVE_CLANG4 =3D $(filter clang4,$(COMPILER_FEATURES)) > +CC_HAVE_GCC4 =3D $(filter gcc4,$(COMPILER_FEATURES)) > +CC_HAVE_GCC5 =3D $(filter gcc5,$(COMPILER_FEATURES)) > +CC_HAVE_GCC6 =3D $(filter gcc6,$(COMPILER_FEATURES)) > +CC_HAVE_GCC10 =3D $(filter gcc10,$(COMPILER_FEATURES)) It is empty if the compiler isn't X. It is also empty if the compiler isn't earlier than X? That would mean version (X+1) would qualify, as it is not X, which is not what we want. I think you meant "... empty string, unless the compiler is X or later." Also, I often see "Note that" to imply "despite what I just said", but as far as I can tell CLANG4 is not all that special and follows the same general rule. Perhaps "Note that" -> "For example," is needed to clarify. Having said all that, I find that the original=20 ifneq ($(filter x y, $(COMPILER_FEATURES)),) idiom is readable enough, and ifneq ($(CC_HAVE_X)$(CC_HAVE_Y),) does not necessarily make it easier to spot X and Y that are being checked with the conditional. > ifeq ($(filter no-error,$(DEVOPTS)),) > DEVELOPER_CFLAGS +=3D -Werror > SPARSE_FLAGS +=3D -Wsparse-error > @@ -9,9 +17,9 @@ endif > DEVELOPER_CFLAGS +=3D -Wall > ifeq ($(filter no-pedantic,$(DEVOPTS)),) > DEVELOPER_CFLAGS +=3D -pedantic > -ifneq ($(filter clang4 gcc5,$(COMPILER_FEATURES)),) > +ifneq ($(CC_HAVE_CLANG4)$(CC_HAVE_GCC5),)