From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F241F45A for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="MV12ddco"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234600AbiJZQGp (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 12:06:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49686 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234670AbiJZQGg (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 12:06:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AFD97E818 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 09:06:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id io19so9603477plb.8 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 09:06:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=B0+pFEuNNZF5XMOAYOGDtUCwuq9Np4QeUtvkdV2JisU=; b=MV12ddcoM9f5OGQ0XsJQjKdi9FAaTE0GBC86oG5ME7ut6SqTtT9lMjGWZIAwqHbesH Hactsut5DbCUNvvXoPRUHYwo7o7cct4Vl7j1g4nc5RR2Jz6yp/fF2ihcZeP7r26J0yAb q7b+G8OKjPuNqHxCycEJzZxV4Wf9Z/4gwjudiTrX9ANpEpN4xM9kdjjlWqpj2YK3sqFv 2Sskt84VXomV/VJPZ+2a7BbbP2J7rBLDYGIiXnNcLRHyj0sMdm1oOSNeC7W3sS05yaQ0 oVL04OGI6NR773gRS0asEJPJZKLgaPvDIT8xbQaFJBFFai9bVVvIR0Ik2bEk3N5eJEG3 NlLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B0+pFEuNNZF5XMOAYOGDtUCwuq9Np4QeUtvkdV2JisU=; b=npBVEmdZO+MFDarSquDjOwN2Zo/wmJhfTZu0JNylfR5xtyASIQo7AnjWDMTRW553um 52R/oSqnJthJOJWtvfrjOncj1qAjto++DF8Y7CJHdNaf/OC+WP8JvUeAFVWGwCrQ+HnL qPVK/36ZjrZaj3QSXintVuU3NOpO6us6nmrQXbVRWhTs5SwM3g2G+kgbfqReDmw0zoqC wx1tC4WXljJll5JUFRl+/z1X40Xx8GlhWU5g2LEgNPyy6kaLlQGTJnSVX0e4NHYmhSjY Oo54kuqHO3NSpwtwqdXf9Zt65C6xtHfs037D66UppEe5pIryZwNY8fJNF9LFPPskxz30 OEjA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3EcsKxdLDEbTKExtUevjk8Bb0nVTvSGVkk7Cj+t6InpjGEoGzg b7NxxZC1kMbKzNRvPEJajwo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4jP5dlZGk31ULV2zm0X5cDxMcaUJ4ikUEmNdJJjFkzsN9+4oQhNgkE10q+16m3WtWohuyqBg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2402:b0:184:29:8ac0 with SMTP id e2-20020a170903240200b0018400298ac0mr43628784plo.174.1666800394685; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 09:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (33.5.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.5.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x15-20020a1709027c0f00b00186748fe6ccsm3069854pll.214.2022.10.26.09.06.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 09:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: Derrick Stolee Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, me@ttaylorr.com, newren@gmail.com, avarab@gmail.com, mjcheetham@outlook.com, steadmon@google.com, Glen Choo , Jonathan Tan , Teng Long Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Bundle URIs III: Parse and download from bundle lists References: <0267162a-098b-2280-46b6-51932a8df6c3@github.com> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 09:06:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <0267162a-098b-2280-46b6-51932a8df6c3@github.com> (Derrick Stolee's message of "Wed, 26 Oct 2022 10:34:41 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Derrick Stolee writes: > This version has been available for a while now without comment. Could > we consider it for merging to 'next' soon? Could somebody who has reviewed it fully give an Ack (or two)? I know an earlier rounds had some comments, but after v3 things have quieted down. I know the change from v4 to v5 has good improvements, but do not claim to have read the other parts in detail. Thanks.