From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC_PATCHv4 5/7] submodule update: respect submodule.actionOnLabel Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:14:12 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1458612372-10966-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> <1458612372-10966-6-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Jens Lehmann , Sebastian Schuberth , "git\@vger.kernel.org" To: Stefan Beller X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 24 22:14:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ajCaD-0001To-9Z for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 22:14:21 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751252AbcCXVOR (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:14:17 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp0.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:62724 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751038AbcCXVOQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:14:16 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA16F4E895; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:14:14 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=gBe56fwn5c+jg/ROZTAhYNIdn0I=; b=iTfItS NlWu7RQ0H01DAzDJ5UpGf39YLZQpRlAKQp4onMqmjDDd89vEDrx1GtyB3VuPRfNb YDZN5pLOTq0BdFbpFOfRe3epTQOTLqA9aDp1pEzQf7OSkIQRWgOugv/6kM/kv+qV FCHTnwkeoN+e1QKFhKvH3UCqnjNWk+ZPnCqeQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=xC2Lz2QuuVbiiGJnUCndff5hywidmzg+ Qk3YUoWMYxbKkhD7cMX/ruE8a3ySuC7TjbRcvQ0A0sNwmmXc7sb4vUnSexPpvRWF TbiMSWNvsDPtChwgIZp0bsFXaR3pXdzQmEawJCgDK55ajBV3RCe9YNljSfxsu2Q7 unPE98M0dEw= Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B334E894; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:14:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.1.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 492E24E893; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:14:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Beller's message of "Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:54:05 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5C5E9B0C-F205-11E5-8C9C-EB7E6AB36C07-77302942!pb-smtp0.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Stefan Beller writes: > Maybe we can revive the term "group" and call it submodule.defaultGroup. > The defaultGroup is defined by selection of names, paths and labels. There are many ways to specify one or more of submodules: - By giving "pathspecs", you would choose submodules whose paths match them; - By giving one or more "names", you would choose the submodule with one of these names; or - By giving one or more "labels", you would choose submodules that have one of these labels. It is perfectly fine to call the chosen set of submodules "group of submodules". It does not have any connotation on what is to be done about the group, so that is probably the best word suggested so far in the thread.