Re: [PATCH 25/29] refs: resolve symbolic refs first

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> writes:

> On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 18:57 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> +retry:
> ...
>> +		if (--attempts_remaining > 0)
>> +			goto retry;
>
> could this be a loop instead of using gotos?

It could be, but given that there are many such exit points, I do
not think an added level of indentation with while() loop is
particularly a good way to go.

Unless that big body of code that is looped around by implicit "goto
retry" is made into a helper function to perform one round of attempt,
which may result in one of success, temporary failure, final failure.
Then we could do:

	int attempts_remaining = N;
        int failed_hard = 0;
        while (!failed_hard && attempts_remaining--)
        	failed_hard = attempt();
	
and the end result _may_ become easier to read (even though I have
to think for a second what the correct code should look like that
comes after the loop).