From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55352018B for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752002AbcGRVg1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:36:27 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:51956 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751892AbcGRVg0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:36:26 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BB02C1B4; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:36:24 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ZrccIgyOy8kTNgDoWK2Ha5/STbI=; b=RDY66P wKDEshQb0TBD5lsLfgObX1C8I7eDjX7/tNsVC3yNH4XZHS95d4GAjI/EZmWNTyqa MaPGxZDEgSc3kqyBKuA1vyqS26HNAJ/uySGRnHXk+XEg+UZ4nVS+lzOUsV1PSjMo 2fwD1klG8f3BHBhH+OQdb1vDY0UClqhHvoz/8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=OlMIXfMGdL2MYwQZ8jqQBfFCSXpwnJ1X 7ML6bIaXNjCteecg3iqb2ehLqM5uDGjBwsXUpODoCz1nmVJwB398L6CheRdI9RJ+ klrhlS9ZzwYNGsc0gMqLhi9BtPXCQxD4MUmNk1UG/qB2L3bItXbrUjQC1XEKlFX2 0Yq3ljRVwKc= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7F12C1B3; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:36:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59E9C2C1B2; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:36:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jonathan Tan Cc: Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Beller Subject: Re: [PATCH] fetch-pack: grow stateless RPC windows exponentially References: <1468867019-13086-1-git-send-email-jonathantanmy@google.com> <20160718185527.GB29326@google.com> <20160718193147.GC29326@google.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:36:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Jonathan Tan's message of "Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:05:22 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AD11CDDC-4D2F-11E6-BB43-EE617A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jonathan Tan writes: > and it would look like that patch. (I would probably redefine > LARGE_FLUSH to be 10 times its current value instead of multiplying it > by 10, since it is not used anywhere else.) Sounds good. Care to do the final version of the patch to be applied? Thanks.