From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4E01F40E for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932353AbcHCRew (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:34:52 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:50928 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755698AbcHCRev (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:34:51 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87552E14D; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:18:43 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=9YCVZZN4SxY6k5vZ60Vch7kxLas=; b=WD7EjU Wc4cQeWELXTH4Gn+xf1W2EfzaLVcrZXPVie6w7c+W1+j81DjsNmk2Lyb0Dmlt9VN uBKMU/EJedSiVzlq7YfIGmcu5pXFxNQbs5NWdoS61u9FFUM1fccGbgih8xyVIm+g 8I5ydWdkXRpJx+wErlsb/71S4KhhDL+TvGja8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Ldbu2VTGJRtpFJb+/zRDOSCZR2KxcikJ cMRFRAD/4yFqrkateOX4mw2ODIg0X9gcKTlHmW2HiVrt7AqtSxs5gX+qfYJVhjJw bSP1F64lbCz99ji8ARouSKz4fk03ZtW14iTSylCMf7V9DeyH+uzdVgWk3wFvYaZF raiTWu5Hpa8= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05112E14C; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:18:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69C1F2E14A; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:18:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Santiago Torres , Git Subject: Re: [OT] USENIX paper on Git References: <20160801224043.4qmf56pmv27riq4i@LykOS.localdomain> <20160803145830.uwssj4uhqfemhr4o@LykOS.localdomain> <20160803171124.yzm5xs67empuka7o@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 10:18:41 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160803171124.yzm5xs67empuka7o@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:11:24 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 543E3242-599E-11E6-96BB-89D312518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > Here are my comments on the work itself. They're critical, but meant in > a friendly way. :) A tl;dr version of your analysis seems to me that "you solve it the same way as the push certificate solves it (including the limitation the latter has)". If that is the case, I think the solution presented in the paper is a good one ;-).