From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC6F20248 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 05:40:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730203AbfDQFkw (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 01:40:52 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:43298 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725848AbfDQFkw (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 01:40:52 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id k17so25463393wrx.10 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:40:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=zLWj56Avjdajbfamv9nEgn4TWiOfgGyXcFPZMjUn+zY=; b=asx4iH8+9o3+IQ5UT2v6QLkEa5LoOPdzbhq2UZtZQW7Yoc06Md88VxrMuIOt9Olxxd +sjA5aTisDWxvY4Fv09ow4tF0Q/E1ZI5LNpV2Ql8Mo2lsWUK0yOhegGE824ytMuRffVD 6oWYBCSok1gBc+WsSPmWAklqqYvu2Tva1Pj/F6j2dEDsmzeXwPzBYbC3Gxs/jeRv3UMh hs9zmwzGXg69MpoeomlFF5j5N2vcmvLYrGu91LUYQpqV3tFkDAtzZ9prDDjnfzMJrBPI AqwiflOsdAaoxrtiKk9yTF4Z40Dj9Vnfipr9fEFz1TaVfpFcVCaoKq2ShKbdJcPWcuCz 2+UA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=zLWj56Avjdajbfamv9nEgn4TWiOfgGyXcFPZMjUn+zY=; b=DwouO+MX4ycpw6NJ/HVDnO3FiiGkJ4zttLW7wLtuFnRO+GtIYh7slRtzNLgGMLu2UB YkrFhxcH8s3+mSNLQFe/0trM0Fyy6TWRHQ5/3MXpUvbFn4UmNqA2Osn18LsZB/lhviQt iSEYAl5616iG6YV3wn2gwdAjuDdFLuiPTRc1XViTZ6UV4NjnTbM6uT/VRNC9P0cYhvp1 XngrrZeuwN2g1xtCmNFmcxqL1TrHpfbW2bnkuVyDwBstkEOwQtcLe4yIHfqRR2gl776x xii/EjoFoFPXa0YQXySIjakZT4vYV31OgQC54myOCvtaiQbwm4v19Ca76+Df7U8klVs2 oD3g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWSh1/tzeBWcesqawhRbb3URPrOu7GZFP5EE2NqL8WCjEip8ICl jzklwaAn//Qyssib7f/P8Dg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyj8wS/N0HiFPVOk01imt160Ss/k0VuK2bMQNOs1x5g+c4joYYH+9pNEXbiryMr3g2DUSYnlQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:428c:: with SMTP id k12mr40896536wrq.279.1555479650050; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (141.255.76.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.76.255.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z11sm1383767wmf.12.2019.04.16.22.40.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:40:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin , Jonathan Nieder , Jonathan Tan Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] Turn `git serve` into a test helper References: <411587e4b80bd4e5a1cb9b1ec438cda7a0681465.1555070430.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <20190417034621.GA19448@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:40:48 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20190417034621.GA19448@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 16 Apr 2019 23:46:21 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: >> I do not personally think, as the design of v2 stands, a standalone >> "serve" server that "can serve anything as long as it goes over >> protocol v2" makes much sense, but perhaps those who have been doing >> the v2 work may have different ideas, in which case let's hear what >> their plans are. > > I too would like to hear more definite comments from people who think > git-serve is worth keeping. In the meantime, there's some discussion > from this thread in December: > ... > https://public-inbox.org/git/20181213195305.249059-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/ > > (In case you do not feel like reading the whole thing, my opinion there > is that git-serve is probably not the right direction, and we would do > well to demote it as Dscho's patch does). I guess we are more or less on the same page, then. I'll let others chime in by waiting for a bit more but I won't wait forever ;-). Thanks.