From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8993C1F463 for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 14:37:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726497AbfK3OhD (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Nov 2019 09:37:03 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:63621 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725957AbfK3OhC (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Nov 2019 09:37:02 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600BE3B795; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 09:37:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=G041xVNfm2NWWSXcqHR9+Jk7mm8=; b=lC43Zw rHsSOKyA2LSq8Hl6Qll7l+//O9uU4pBp0GNY0nb5RmfWAYi45pGSopvIg+u47t0o Z966fCP5IojHKZr3UbKcv2B04vW8FH7WSGx500mDR7ndTLa4lF2DXrZhypPzW4jL llQC22uBVdlbo5tsh+0Rg6STUiVEYc4kWq+6w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=HMuuwVpQsYlzzuPdve9u5jmSDCDAh6JL W2dechyu7jZyJUYHK4cdISrZ4luQpYJrsh5iU7qU43g/QJjxlzxjR08s5oxifM5t 9md4d3zPkSJVdz94mJnb+QHJ5L1wPfUSm9nKniMGpGV6dmXmMOojHwE9agSEXPFB qN/gPZi7bXA= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A4A3B794; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 09:37:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D9033B793; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 09:36:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Derrick Stolee Cc: Jeff King , Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, ryenus@gmail.com, szeder.dev@gmail.com, Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress() References: <20191126122022.GB10290@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 06:36:57 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Derrick Stolee's message of "Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:39:14 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DD3051F0-137E-11EA-9702-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Derrick Stolee writes: > On 11/26/2019 7:20 AM, Jeff King wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 09:28:21PM +0000, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote: >> >>> Update in V5: >>> >>> I took Peff's advice for using "env" to use this delay in the GC test. >> >> Thanks. No further complaints from me. :) >> >> There's an open issue to investigate unpack-trees sending progress to a >> non-stderr tty (which you can see in the test suite by setting >> GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY=0), but I think that should be handled separately. >> My limited digging suggests that it goes back to 2007 or earlier. > > This is on my personal to-do list. Thanks! Thanks, all. It seems that this round is ready for 'next'?