From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923031F4B9 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 21:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729714AbgAXVAt (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:00:49 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:64916 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726454AbgAXVAs (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:00:48 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E50D420D6; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:00:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=IYqWK/kfhyDhC7HbxQSZRYwsV9o=; b=cixnKC spsWsA02XXaZgYasJDzicwwLWKkenO5hGrFAzXVuwp57Z8QqfPNCmb+zZNbeOS/w D1WoOzzJ+t32U9hlFphqr7FDY3NJhCEyu8x/9P9APoVh36WMYkF/kBV19bdy8wt3 K4SlYeyCEFKaMzSEVHha0lKNYCxQKkjGPYBHc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=To9bSIR8BXnFSk3AFnlqlyHcC1g+WdF5 x+Z8Nim2gRQf6ssnM/WxTspju0MzcSFHDPRfdEIjYGZCZo4Fj8sYFioPQyvWVVTn 163XFHcB4L1P1V/yNE0+6dhXx4Vz0ZiInU7iwco0j2W3iK91Kn7sxaJxDyU6qRIB A0ExN4KJqqo= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16511420D5; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:00:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A587420D4; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:00:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Bert Wesarg Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] remote rename/remove: improve handling of configuration values References: Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:00:46 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Bert Wesarg's message of "Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:25:20 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9836BF8C-3EEC-11EA-AA6C-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org All steps looked quite sensibly done. > - patch 5 will be replaced by/rebased on Matthew's work in 'config: allow user to > know scope of config options', once 'config_scope_name' is available I expect that Matthew's topic would become solid enough after one more reroll to name the function back to config_scope_name(); after that, let's drop the step and instead fork this topic off of Matthew's topic to queue the remaining patches on top. Thanks.