From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A87A1F9E0 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728383AbgD1Red (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:34:33 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:53326 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728022AbgD1Rec (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:34:32 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FEACE7A1; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:34:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=njzOgmSRhzQErU7lybeuVPf6nCs=; b=Fc4neR 1JEYdHwXoZ0LHg75cozCOfyribWtrc9623Dtbr801Vwfi5ktHAAg/wFBNiHR5Z+E 3v9CvLiaugD7KpXurXGIA1+RJ/RRFT9037wiYYXfPD6y+Cd2VzDXEneJt4VrN8fj 0sCXbhCvq8Os2E13uNlXes7fdftqALJY31y4o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=nYSUBRGWDPLb04yjcfM/J7wIbpYROCjv 2NVfHLB77KAGXdvS0OPusWYDI83QhYAoeGqlTsm70nZbJzxuCRcgyZu37i3LjQmc 5whdJKOLCwz8aScyruqRVf1fPMLXJw1X2uUrCCUblf1ZqVAki4x37YXJ0cXcCU4I scLUAO+fbnc= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C97BCE7A0; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:34:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FF7ECE79F; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:34:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Denton Liu , Git Mailing List , Andrew White Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use OPT_CALLBACK and OPT_CALLBACK_F References: <20200428084543.GC2381876@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:34:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200428084543.GC2381876@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 28 Apr 2020 04:45:43 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 82749974-8976-11EA-B824-8D86F504CC47-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:36:28AM -0400, Denton Liu wrote: > >> In the codebase, there are many options which use OPTION_CALLBACK in a >> plain ol' struct definition. However, we have the OPT_CALLBACK and >> OPT_CALLBACK_F macros which are meant to abstract these plain struct >> definitions away. These macros are useful as they semantically signal to >> developers that these are just normal callback option with nothing fancy >> happening. > > I think this is worth doing. It's a little easier to read, and sets a > better example anyone copying the code. Sure. And it would be much nicer if the patch actually applies. I am getting "SHA-1 information for builtin/push.c is unusable" from "am -3". I'd reject the first hunk on builtin/push.c as that part should be done with an updated version of the patch that is titled "push: unset PARSE_OPT_OPTARG for --recurse-submodules" and apply the rest as an independent clean-up patch. Thanks, both.