From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AADF1F531 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 22:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726202AbgHGWHr (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:07:47 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:60193 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726015AbgHGWHp (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:07:45 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CBC6C8C1; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:07:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=La/p/b69dG4+BHoOpn5jrZH+hC0=; b=WjHl2D nr5FmOLm/m6jX8DEVY72tGm2ybF+UzxWFp0Kab64HhIErWYbqlrGwyIkYXrSpZEA MqAAOFSoCqSQIu9zE01mRAaB2qxO53vrvP0rjS8bT6ewyxvTDgot8VMMnpQB5TMC mJwUDvppfnwxqWQYScGdToJNUrU+xErFJsAcY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=GuBaFKKAoZL4nyLTtNPWTVMPaInsX1II w/1jlByO5uJ0Y9GjdeNiQSzOI1Wvjk9bUzZS4J2NhnRfAh5j1K4+tvPAL1ELlREI oR+4Fl4Kd5QHbwTNPnAAHAUR5aZjldcpDKh9oR/A/1b68igvxcCVyH1taC5Wxzbq sYEkiUf5K8Y= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A316C8C0; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:07:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 374FC6C8BF; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:07:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Eric Sunshine Cc: Christian Couder , Aaron Lipman , git , Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Introduce --first-parent flag for git bisect References: <20200801175840.1877-1-alipman88@gmail.com> <20200804220113.5909-1-alipman88@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 15:07:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Eric Sunshine's message of "Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:17:43 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6ABD9A14-D8FA-11EA-83F2-2F5D23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Eric Sunshine writes: > Consequently, I'm not in a > position to say whether or not there are any fundamental issues with > the changes made by any of these patches. Sorry, that wasn't what I meant. A reroll would be done with an updated test, so I was asking your eyeball once again on that.