From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D831F66F for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 23:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726299AbgKSXfT (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:35:19 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:54052 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725944AbgKSXfT (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:35:19 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3221E11701F; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:35:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=INlcooPxPfEFzves0dyPm7Uj1sQ=; b=IRUIZL CRjydv5hoh1vA4XOzbVbR3VNzzR8XqezyOwN9F/CaWYU1dmxHiCj2WOwt2Ryoo5h TR9HASaGkK9odkw5vHGxvTLNnr86MWtFJc8E5zwGxq6JgRJcSUB0l+4oxN2Yi6lm 8t6YU/7XdvqnoGS1CLC5p77Hkm2L8XW5AFVY4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Jl7o5V1N9CMHFKpyFGI4gEKuiUd0HDLV 5a6I0P9X/vIu0pk2ulrylSlPNotVg3q3haJDHSLPrsc4tz862bQuC7RsIKJG7F7q Arxzdn4n6Fdp1xbPdE4xte24noCFF8dvLXQ8sxjFVdtQERVR2XivPEWfve7albAp jiedt7Xz30I= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A42311701E; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:35:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59C0011701D; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:35:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Contreras , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Johannes Schindelin , Jeff King , Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/28] tests: use main as default branch name References: Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:35:12 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:44:18 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DF9FCBCE-2ABF-11EB-B16B-E43E2BB96649-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" writes: > Note that this branch is based on next, mostly because it would otherwise > conflict with en/merge-tests, jk/diff-release-filespec-fix and > ds/maintenance-part-3. Note that what is queued in my tree is unlikely to be based on 'next', but instead start by merging jk/diff-release-filespec-fix and possibly the fix-up for ds/maintenance-part-3 into 'master' and then applying these patches on top. This will be time consuming but cannot be avoided ;-) I just started building such a topic branch. It is likely that the result of today's integration cycle would be pushed out much later than usual. Thanks.