From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDBA1F8C4 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 19:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233105AbhBESOc (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:14:32 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:51901 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233215AbhBESN7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:13:59 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475CB95DB1; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:55:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=/AoumrkD0HLK/K7usehIc5oBmMw=; b=d7Unvq u5PhsvcwmsiF4NeafFQtMuSo8WSDOzcLw5TavhErUbz00BQUEvLTavkIOnYtvUyx VvxyJmGO7dQGbjHEQGtR1Z0Ax9p3OILQrt8xzx2nlyDiytZSeBomna4WSDR+btN0 0OXNCDoz0X2adfsBIj9vEG/5Mm4F9Owz/k+4A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qQucUuPXTVN9yU4xjpiQR9VDu+IjXD6d evpbYZZ7wxhgOJBQHYIWDVmZS0qDURySF/qMwPrkMpvuMkjYNnf4pF7EqXiwROlB 8nMkOraEz/qfelFeT7DoLcRF2/yIOu00ssFOdj9mcfhQCLL06/FGAwafqdBuxdAL bhXL0zhRhX0= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFA995DAF; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:55:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.243.138.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5BF595DAD; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:55:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Jeff Hostetler , Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJu?= =?utf-8?B?ZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Jeff King , Chris Torek , Jeff Hostetler Subject: Re: candidate branches for `maint`, was Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Simple IPC Mechanism References: <1be67634-4188-9ef3-306c-72b78ea856b5@jeffhostetler.com> Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:55:39 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:19:19 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1F1E75A2-67EC-11EB-A48E-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: >> Are there other topics that deserve to be in 'maint' that are >> "obviously correct" people can think of? > > I looked over the branches merged into `master` that are not in `maint`, > and from a cursory look, these seem to be good candidates: > ... > There are also a couple test updates that might be nice to have in > `maint`: > ... > Finally, there are documentation updates that I would probably merge, if I > was tasked with updating `maint`: > ... Your list more or less matches what the ML (merge later) script on the todo/ branch produces when it is fed the RelNotes (the script just greps for "merge laster to maint" comments and shows the result in way a bit easier to use for me). The ones that are in RelNotes but not in your list are ab/branch-sort # 7 (11 days ago) ar/t6016-modernise # 1 (3 weeks ago) dl/p4-encode-after-kw-expansion # 1 (3 weeks ago) fc/t6030-bisect-reset-removes-auxiliary-files # 1 (4 weeks ago) ma/doc-pack-format-varint-for-sizes # 1 (3 weeks ago) ma/more-opaque-lock-file # 5 (11 days ago) ma/t1300-cleanup # 3 (3 weeks ago) zh/arg-help-format # 2 (3 weeks ago) and I think all of them are safe to merge down. Thanks for being an independent source I can rely on to sanity check what is in RelNotes. Very much appreciated.