From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146361F4B4 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 00:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235527AbhDFA5B (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:57:01 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:54918 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230239AbhDFA47 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:56:59 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C89B28E0; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:56:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=4mC/fmKXHdL1XbkhWDvG1Mno9dE=; b=dldykP v1DjN1q4pJKRvkPxF7AJj1CEyIqNqoVwj57gxwzs6sXj4irifPIRPS2v27KaqwQj lY0ffH4V8bNMs4vfbBd6f333jNzMVCjTJTnwEzVl8IaG3Jm+VFwmeqtYkVAKR4nF EXOVirXUlpAGxTe9guA9smYKW8Pi+akWPlKUw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=p6YQl3CU6LG9KS3JGitGoHNipdhnqSTu IuYmCvJcaZPjoFtPDP1ZEBShBLM6+k1uttc1haFVbAgpsHYAeiXNaKdgt2F9i5V8 nZIBbH6IEQr+i1jDNRCgpLxB/SZ0HoCPRWbtJXSo4R95sVTdnYWkSz+0cgcl11Hx gfCl9GRU3Jw= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51166B28DF; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:56:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99942B28DE; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:56:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Georgios Kontaxis via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , "brian m. carlson" , Georgios Kontaxis Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] gitweb: redacted e-mail addresses feature. References: Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 17:56:50 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:00:17 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F936ECBA-9672-11EB-A290-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > "Georgios Kontaxis via GitGitGadget" > writes: > >> From: Georgios Kontaxis >> >> Gitweb extracts content from the Git log and makes it accessible >> over HTTP. As a result, e-mail addresses found in commits are >> exposed to web crawlers and they may not respect robots.txt. >> This can result in unsolicited messages. >> ... > Will queue as-is. Input from those who are more adept at Perl > and/or interested in helping polish gitweb are still welcome, but at > my level of interest on the topic, this version looks as good as it > gets ;-) Comments by anybody who is more adept at Perl and/or more well versed in gitweb and e-mail privacy issues? Otherwise I am inclined to merge it down to 'next' as-is in a couple of days. Thanks.