From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA65C1F5AE for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 05:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229545AbhFGF5z (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2021 01:57:55 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:53393 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229436AbhFGF5x (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2021 01:57:53 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB759135A5C; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 01:56:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=3wNhQg0OAGuBPRJLRAyU7B8U6qZlwqh++TwdOt BoHMY=; b=gD8QPW5V5kMHC7YHLyfLiFqqaAY6F5fkYN6E92gLru+Lw7QlVTO26Q HRy3wPCQVEjas78Yvdy8qHwR664G8PNVTkggGTKtNJU/J6bbF1xn7e1tfF8D8/PR mZGzdMTtJuw++DKgOyqCCOpVqxI8iGdZlR5AOAQ29KoC087WtFyWI= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4036135A5B; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 01:56:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.172.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03C4D135A58; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 01:55:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Christian Couder , Hariom Verma , ZheNing Hu Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [GSOC][RFC] ref-filter: add %(raw:textconv) and %(raw:filters) References: Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 14:55:58 +0900 In-Reply-To: (ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget's message of "Sat, 05 Jun 2021 09:13:28 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 08E551A2-C755-11EB-B471-FA9E2DDBB1FC-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" writes: > The current series is based on 0efed9435 ([GSOC] ref-filter: add %(raw) > atom) I do not have that commit object, but these six patches include the two commits that are %(raw) and %(raw:size), so I'll just discard the old round that wasn't based on the atom-type stuff and queue these six as a single series. As I already said, I am not sure how %(rest) makes any sense outside the context of "cat-file --batch"; I suspect it would make more sense to make it easier to arrange certain placeholders to error out when used in a context where they do not make sense (e.g. use of --rest in "git branch --list").