From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_CSS,URIBL_CSS_A shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD081F670 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 19:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245187AbiCGTzU (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2022 14:55:20 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44532 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235127AbiCGTzT (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2022 14:55:19 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C1465748F for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 11:54:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D1110E88C; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 14:54:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=XuBocjHcvsG7Ux/MwE5XiI+qEer37dAMuVWJ8R SEgDQ=; b=tfMZuhFJeJ2AVeunWVAbgNL2td6I1raWTh2l7vqV12NQFxzIMDw5fo xpqrs8RMQMT4cJFgh008dGLirpBgBlMMCJyZjak6PSntYtasBI52lBI7JzWc3Kwb Gw1Uz+sYw+QAiigiP5WVClauQgjg8D/6xkvR3Soqd3eRYLKA3Jk8A= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F15110E88B; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 14:54:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.230.65.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A97E710E88A; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 14:54:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Derrick Stolee Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, stolee@gmail.com, avarab@gmail.com, zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com, jonathantanmy@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] bundle: unbundle promisor packs References: <85d434f8-0eb1-c6f7-dfd4-99bffbfbba57@github.com> <51fabaef-4849-2d9f-285a-3f442f803717@github.com> Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 11:54:22 -0800 In-Reply-To: <51fabaef-4849-2d9f-285a-3f442f803717@github.com> (Derrick Stolee's message of "Mon, 7 Mar 2022 14:49:53 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 62FF4FBC-9E50-11EC-A180-5E84C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Derrick Stolee writes: > I've been trying this: > > git clone --no-local --filter=$filter "file://$(pwd)" cloned && > > which "succeeds" with this in the stderr: > > warning: filtering not recognized by server, ignoring Hmph, and we won't see it when going over ssh to the same repository? That is puzzling. >>> an error condition into 'git clone' to say "Cannot currently clone >>> from a filtered bundle" to help users understand the issue? >> >> It would be a workable stepwise solution, I would think. It is not >> like we are robbing an existing feature from users---it merely is >> that the support of partial cloning over different "transport" is >> uneven, which is to be expected, especially in earlier phase of >> introducing a new feature. > > That was my understanding, too. Good to see us on the same page. Thanks.