From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542101F4D7 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 18:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="kGox8JSo"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231631AbiERSJS (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2022 14:09:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53296 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230147AbiERSJR (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2022 14:09:17 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7AB6146429 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 11:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006C918C4EA; Wed, 18 May 2022 14:09:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Uj/EyB7EH50ljKwvZrARdwbg7KZY8+wBaFUJIS FYHjg=; b=kGox8JSoDFJX6ZQI2LGJJXWsG8/2Xoyfrp/C807ObiIdbz02dYVW6G WL8toU7f96bplbbFwjq0LsOzX0SXafsuTULpsPdXfXpwmGNUff4Kqja2TuZpRfjw +RCOCz4GI4eXAx1//EWSN/zBBMGzCgNPeepxygw1QljWDDw7DBZzE= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEDC18C4E7; Wed, 18 May 2022 14:09:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.65.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A5B718C4E6; Wed, 18 May 2022 14:09:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Cc: "'Plato Kiorpelidis'" , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/15] dir-iterator: option to iterate dirs in pre-order References: <20220509175159.2948802-1-kioplato@gmail.com> <20220509175159.2948802-14-kioplato@gmail.com> <88421b18-0fa0-236a-b74b-c5ee3ef53279@gmail.com> <20220518173947.4qabalu6mjmzumen@compass> <016201d86adf$5a4e1eb0$0eea5c10$@nexbridge.com> Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 11:09:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: <016201d86adf$5a4e1eb0$0eea5c10$@nexbridge.com> (rsbecker@nexbridge.com's message of "Wed, 18 May 2022 13:47:27 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9E61001A-D6D5-11EC-8607-CBA7845BAAA9-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org writes: > Could this be a fallback position where nftw() is not available? I am not > how broadly nftw() is supported but it appears to do what you are looking > for. Yeah, nftw() sounds like a better approach than what we have been doing for the past decade by writing our own iterator.