From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393751F859 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758119AbcIGQpC (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:45:02 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:56899 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756334AbcIGQpB (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:45:01 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1F33AFA6; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:44:55 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=hW5yP3UjY9QXc7fMdKw/3k1C250=; b=Qp317Q tec4W+JYcbfpcDVgjQIU7PdQFXKFWlBj5QnZLGV4dolzKkxXeH5RomxRp3FSdPRQ KjT/DFLH8Xh6mzMA23OvafUxCMFpoIziue/nSSCDEi/lVEvA4bqEk8ROsL3Bf+R4 v6956/Ef7jgKvDpjgwLC7sT9+KGd3r3VEquA8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=buqr3Z/2ConghAwpmM8TEtYyN+l6X6TC sPNTRFBnRDuNYJUqZvPIgrRN29xGkyG5A5yXETan7g1JyFJfmF8h4D84Bzrw+5bx 0lu4A3qYdANtBs3+YrVYV/62siQ04OfAm11F+OrD+nvPSzO/8s8il5VxStMUN8ie Vsqo9uBEwDo= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C803AFA5; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:44:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BCD83AFA3; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:44:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Thomas Gummerer Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Jeff King , Jan Keromnes , git@vger.kernel.org, Ingo =?utf-8?Q?Br=C3=BCckl?= , Edward Thomson Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] add: document the chmod option References: <20160904113954.21697-1-t.gummerer@gmail.com> <20160904113954.21697-2-t.gummerer@gmail.com> <20160905192202.GB8254@hank> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 09:44:52 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160905192202.GB8254@hank> (Thomas Gummerer's message of "Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:22:02 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 67722BB0-751A-11E6-A4BC-F7BB12518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Thomas Gummerer writes: > Ugh, thanks for catching. I'll wait a few days for more comments and > address it in a re-roll. Thanks for starting this. I agree with you and Peff that running "chmod" on the resulting index after other "add" operations took place is the right approach, as we want to flip the executable bit for paths that hasn't otherwise changed.