From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEC3208CD for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 06:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750947AbdHSGR2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Aug 2017 02:17:28 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:62487 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750832AbdHSGR1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Aug 2017 02:17:27 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59A09C907; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 02:17:19 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=NG9p3J3AM+Il5Dwq5vnBvvN6tew=; b=d6IHpZ n3BAds0oX+JPZZzZ3+XpYpDoEHxloGK+oMKDvnb4Wzm2xCJ3Uqi8O6HQDGul1Y0i AK8kb+9d/8Jo9JraUWH57EXWXazSVQaDrPjzpluH6bMDRQaeffYmTLClOC/XImrA 6C+kqfzyM3rMT8atBBf4mAGqg3UaH80PGoKCc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=b1yn+d2bR8I66079gNkMQgrQFkXBImPn hxnoT/MOqRvngv1X1i9Cy1PrLN8GLcHcO4XkFQ6kFFSXaa4f1wK25NwO5Vmh+/HB OySHcZ14VKWEujk8Z9VWnR7PIuzP0mNRrFT4jkSzGtYavv2UJ2Mt2SCFahMkPj+S NI5OLJIIP7w= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAB89C906; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 02:17:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F16D99C904; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 02:17:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Stefan Beller Cc: Brandon Williams , "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Lars Schneider Subject: Re: [PATCH] pull: respect submodule update configuration References: <20170818220431.22157-1-sbeller@google.com> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 23:17:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Beller's message of "Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:05:29 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0DDBE342-84A6-11E7-A1BD-9D2B0D78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Stefan Beller writes: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Stefan Beller wrote: >> From: Lars Schneider > > eh, that is what I get for amending to Lars patch. Sorry, I do not understand this remark. If you started from a patch by Lars (I do not recall seeing it but the list is high volume so it is entirely plausible that I may have missed it) and tweaked it, it is more than OK to keep the original author and record it in an in-body From: header like you did, instead of taking authorship over.