From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8F91F463 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387862AbfIITYu (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:24:50 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:57223 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729060AbfIITYu (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:24:50 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF9B2ABE2; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:24:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=axl7Yk8ubMHXMTN+ghUcxbDWpY4=; b=hvYkym obQrpltM5/TKfDE7SksffzrHq4DAZ6IY1GZzjFPYvTWw2kieqSA8IaUs+CbxiR65 9E1c5fpF2g6n6tzdqCvhMQfbmWUvEBD2xDu82OsX5os9f4uD9Nj3gD6Dsiw1UBgH kTziBG2tY+Nlf6m40H0sWNXaiAnFQWmiRI1UI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=eJzETfjvib4ficTVbbI/0HBkixVgFUNU hGBv8QUa3+LCgNjh2PRp+niZwCN34sX0KWtc7btn8Kw2Kcw8JwZObWs6837kWePZ b6dfgY1D2wZ3CUCtRP8puvT+jRVerXYxV/LTrQQ0tLJwxKLJlttKxraWXYZy4D0F VIYbJGnAwPs= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4CD2ABE1; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:24:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CEB62ABE0; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:24:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Phillip Wood Cc: Rohit Ashiwal , Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de, git@vger.kernel.org, martin.agren@gmail.com, newren@gmail.com, t.gummerer@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] rebase -i: support more options References: <20190806173638.17510-1-rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com> <20190907115034.14933-1-rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 12:24:46 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Phillip Wood's message of "Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:51:22 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7C5D2650-D337-11E9-B598-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Phillip Wood writes: > Yes I had assumed that the cherry pick would become the first patch of > this series and be dropped from pw/rebase-i-show-HEAD-to-reword. Ah, such an arrangement would have made a log more sense, indeed. > As pw/rebase-i-show-HEAD-to-reword is slated for next perhaps these > could build on that. The first patch needs am -3 to apply to that > branch but the result looks ok and the rest apply as is. As this is more or less "new feature" series, I do not mind too much to make it depend on another topic in flight that is getting solid. Thanks for helping.