From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321961F463 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390523AbfIJATt (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 20:19:49 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:65106 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732404AbfIJATt (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 20:19:49 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAB32DC54; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 20:19:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=wy6G6F0EHCYFk7qNBet4CEcSlZA=; b=EDUgM8 8+WCaDNg1Sb2lcd3VtXgGHvwEcCDFnk6mOGHZMCKVz+9prP42xeeo6x7kAEPF7Ux 3evXMpQ/LvzNTpqyDBZji65bdA06p2IyjT58mAcqCrfTaHxJMjmAlmeOEp7E1N1E 9/R4h5yeHYyvG06q5FvWe3M2PxCDz4LAl2R4w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lM7x3yBOXXj2L3TjACYvcEywPsgIn6UC b7O+DdeoWwq25v2NKPYyBGA4oFCTGxGP9jVV1/OSY9XjiFD9/qc5Eq7T4xl/CRQW pPUdh00r75Y+y/uw7OBdjzzO5VaMzlfWCY7D7csoVF8xh3J3pG5I3ts2UrLW/9Gf oRLBHRa7rec= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E5D2DC53; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 20:19:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56FA82DC52; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 20:19:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "brian m. carlson" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2019, #01; Sat, 7) References: <20190909234715.GO11334@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 17:19:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20190909234715.GO11334@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> (brian m. carlson's message of "Mon, 9 Sep 2019 23:47:16 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B1BC685A-D360-11E9-BA60-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "brian m. carlson" writes: > On 2019-09-07 at 17:26:53, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * bc/object-id-part17 (2019-08-19) 26 commits >> - midx: switch to using the_hash_algo >> ... >> - builtin/replace: make hash size independent >> >> Preparation for SHA-256 upgrade continues. >> >> Looked mostly OK, with a possible update. >> cf. <20190820223606.GJ365197@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> > > Just to update on the status of this, I wasn't planning on a reroll, > although I'm happy to do so if folks have feedback. Opinions for or > against the current state are welcome. FWIW, I am quite pleased with these and deeply appreciate the work you've been doing on this topic. Thanks.