From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18621F4B5 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 05:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726549AbfKOF0i (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:26:38 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:60696 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725848AbfKOF0i (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:26:38 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F5B8F7FA; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:26:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=w4F8njR8twHIoipsg8kZyPbDNiQ=; b=N4nQGB apChQRZmvJVvQ5iTRk7n/KLqQ0yx9u6pyL9W9uJ7oEvdhqSyogYst9lVk2GrHCbp 7f8X8CQcWCeIOU0s4dwtv6R1F8z9znM6I4KjOP22HSSsJOhX6dGVikubtazOH4IX 9CeOLp25cGreo5kztMEYcyPSXgWcRq4+E4O70= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=dl41XwNaYvYmrfYitR3D4reoYm1mD+st K3u4G4Uyd7OkTCvRV6ayte4fSDRjGIx1GBZ4BmGsZYCgF1AsWiJ3txaLkxRw/S8J BrMf706ahbK62Wkt7P4T18F6/LwpyoVmQxd0KqHRGdh3PUiDxuQOHgYNc1Fd8sHo pNN+h4ytCI4= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4491B8F7F9; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:26:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43F428F7F8; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:26:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Denton Liu Cc: Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/27] t: define test_grep_return_success() References: <3f79d23b40c0586d0351f4d721097be4f7ba26b8.1573779465.git.liu.denton@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:26:31 +0900 In-Reply-To: <3f79d23b40c0586d0351f4d721097be4f7ba26b8.1573779465.git.liu.denton@gmail.com> (Denton Liu's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:01:19 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7C60EA46-0768-11EA-8714-8D86F504CC47-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Denton Liu writes: > +# Calls grep but returns zero even if no matching lines are found. > +test_grep_return_success () { > + grep "$@" || : > +} It makes sense to have a helper like this, but the name is quite a mouthful. I wonder if we can call it with a shorter name, e.g. "test_filter" or something.