From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956F41F487 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 17:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390049AbgDBRnC (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:43:02 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:60260 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389264AbgDBRnC (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:43:02 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C805FEF5; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:43:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ymZUBcA0kdenKWAn/Vb9LoGmBgk=; b=dQvMmd 4rwb7p4jwMHm8p1U87YA5cmeidx9Hpp6qOEq/O0sm+8vB9EkY3AguwSGrOk0ajzZ bbOBoNJpiPUESp70Mpu1AEllvrBUBlV5e72vKQHKKu8oBNrRHfl1CLrRlHIDi/9c DbgfLy1dJtPXn+v/0hGxXmni72mmmV2RJ3ws8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=tulo3/2seyOOiEpOM0TyOhWqAtTvCKQC VLfhDYjgtFDm63xu263OB6F07tzlRRdFoeQbCnkILT3YZX2Szml+qgceVqxq4Zpe 5QTKCpGMxEd3rD0pfV96BUSgeksOAs6f3chATUsQYeAOvtegIdkp6DzPnkinlG2e CfIKikYvpQk= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFA45FEF4; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:43:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D6855FEF3; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:43:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Miriam R." Cc: git Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2020, #10; Tue, 31) References: Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 10:42:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Miriam R.'s message of "Thu, 2 Apr 2020 08:56:35 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6549C30A-7509-11EA-BEBC-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Miriam R." writes: > I sent a v2 patch series of "Finish converting git bisect to C part 2" > twelve days ago: > https://public-inbox.org/git/20200321161020.22817-1-mirucam@gmail.com/ > and I haven't received any feedback, who could review it again? > Also I was wondering why the patch series is not in 'pu'. Unfortunately what's not viewed won't touch 'pu', and a topic without many interested parties can be left unattended for a long time. In an ideal world, capable people would drop whatever they are doing immediately after seeing others' patches on the list and spend their time on reviewing them, but the world is not ideal X-.