From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E1F1F5AE for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 01:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727057AbgGGBsM (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 21:48:12 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:63394 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726961AbgGGBsM (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 21:48:12 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDA9D8049; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 21:48:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=yQ2+Dn8DZQNA8Rr/MagWLkNv+Ko=; b=g5Wzyv Q2TwOr5Z4BJPoPWBVtvAqyjbXCuhygyk3WZjzle9UD030RjK/9ybiOUQp5xJ8Dqy frHXPkEMg4/kpUcqdPuLMFlryyQupVl3iaUIjnGVGtsct8T87SgcufVXi/81EwrW 2qM42yumwEkB00L+5B3ep7qmqyfe+vbySpfx4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ecgfLfiZKIQW4L6/4KuhgN0emz1K1pMW sXZc5pY8+xT1CtR/58ye39jLRVFg2OwhV/mnE8aXkK7JsWSMD0JDIbMIyrLSZmR6 LmSG+PGIlbbIMc7YFYCVnCYFMfNo6VqxcJuuwMJ2MIHlkxSzsucYh3NVBIajZBDx Sc9kPDJGMQU= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63744D8048; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 21:48:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9579D8046; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 21:48:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Trygve Aaberge , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Hostetler , Heba Waly Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Wait for child on signal death for aliases to builtins References: <20200704221839.421997-1-trygveaa@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 18:48:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sun, 5 Jul 2020 04:15:56 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E8838ED8-BFF3-11EA-A0E3-8D86F504CC47-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > Thank you for those references. I did try to make sure that b914084007 > would not regress on anything, but apparently I failed to verify the final > form. Since all it did was to remove `#if 0`...`#endif` guards, it was > unfortunately quite easy for this regression to slip in. Yeah, I recall wondering why it was safe to suddenly enable the segment of the disabled code all of sudden.