From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A7C1F5AE for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729930AbgGMOot (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:44:49 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:59931 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729703AbgGMOot (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:44:49 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9735A321; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:44:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=OzgMD59FFLmkXok3Ye7IgpeXGDk=; b=YKQb60 IQmyJI3xk1WEl4sW59rvwMVsQ62hZdHVYPJ8IsNf6Nlfq4+V+oVxObFGp4hHTitj HIp7TbfiPK45j2E3uB2nHr4tupapNJYKHGLAgJs739k7zMM2oq4OKW4B/yKiaNms QFsuifSwOBLIU/4hQIaCKQXvOo6SqE+xw+rEM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=rb/mEV9iI1/624kjoRNge7TybAirPfnh LW5em0Wr9bXpOX4YE5cPxduUFlXvfIM94eEq/H0t1tShaCrHjrQriPBhTRTS+1Fb VhK9rVkN73jScVpjFmfffIBdIBpPV6r1pV3u/mAAhxtyM5B/nnAvH7K5cvp8KOyz rtSn/DgJrC8= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569495A31F; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:44:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6BA75A31E; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:44:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Tobias Girstmair Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gitweb: Replace tag with full URLs (when using PATH_INFO) References: <20200711203947.23520-1-tobi@isticktoit.net> <20200712183329.3358-1-tobi@isticktoit.net> <20200712230508.GA1000433@isticktoit.net> <20200713092928.GA1003518@isticktoit.net> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 07:44:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200713092928.GA1003518@isticktoit.net> (Tobias Girstmair's message of "Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:29:28 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 65AC8CDE-C517-11EA-89B3-01D9BED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Tobias Girstmair writes: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 09:34:36PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>And without this patch, the src URL needs to know where this >>repository appears in the site's URL namespace? > > Exactly. Sorry if my lack of proper terminology made this confusing No, I was confused because I did not know Gitweb showed README.html file in the $GIT_DIR of each repository. Any other cases that are affected by this, or is README the only one?