From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B53F1F4B4 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389163AbgJOQUQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:20:16 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:64047 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388461AbgJOQUQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:20:16 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362D9865B5; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:20:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=2e0yyIje5VjmaPVMXJQnJk8sdu0=; b=lad2Wk jOn1p6c2OuIQ75xebTqyLXAGTfLXfBtcH4tt+GZR5S1NsAkNhFF6mMQ/ga/fmkI0 34Fi5NzGPF1qVd1OzXxjKglNJDYSC+bbnHPWJ/rPhP9x/MDVxVJcciqg5osVzQK1 QkXt7iBKP/dOhAUlz/4ogPRssPqVReg0Y1gCo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=kjpWah/+PRGb/JxX/jA8aU+6A4V0uf8h NHM40kiutskSUBg1YaA94IMiaFww6lGsea7B7UQiuKQdWPkmyZxP3fPhhmbcWSFn nDdzvJkNBpHaqCESOepiHoG7ps60FGboGC9a9dYg2CP0WpRx5JDy3sE+WWY3cOfU c6mGdIE4AtI= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E73B865B4; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:20:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9521865B3; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:20:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood , Taylor Blau , Elijah Newren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] test-lib: allow selecting tests by substring/regex with --run References: <41e2528e83ba7087c9d21f0b15efed416f1512f8.1602616786.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <20201014170413.GB21687@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 09:20:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20201014170413.GB21687@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:04:13 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4DF3C1E0-0F02-11EB-88EF-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 07:19:44PM +0000, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote: > >> Many of our test scripts have several "setup" tests. It's a lot easier >> to say >> >> ./t0050-filesystem.sh --run=setup,9 > > I like this direction very well. > > There was a small discussion recently that we might be better off > dropping test script numbers entirely,... I think I missed that one. A pointer, if you have one handy? Thanks.