From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CA61F66F for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726477AbgKRUrA (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:47:00 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:50843 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726195AbgKRUrA (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:47:00 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C11901CA; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:46:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=MzLsbUOiYPSrbbrGf/vkXbQabI4=; b=GN+/ry zgeh8MTu1hpXtRMoL80YF0+q4bX8sRFqcqnfR3lZDQDwVvVAQcEELvWwfGJJo9rh Sl560vz/dMqui8HoSwTIMMFefT2tWi0mZ2c25dcS/S/LCbOUckZNcgNyo6DJW99V pQSHvVwmnmB+PTOe0Xk8DChKT6Q5bHOuzPHLE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Dw1OsSEYxAhr+KaN4JdjQNfDSPmnbsd0 2VdVPY5npKxX/Vl5s/Z0+vXO6UfpBcOvws/uPddYqAF2u+wNlhQv/JVS60oSt9nH kDjKIYdVevtqtDNQGWFqDLoxeG5XKUEtqsrdJKBmQKX5hsolgQMFysaYhd8u6w0S pnZMBq7LpU0= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E060901C9; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:46:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3C9E901C6; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:46:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] t2106 vs. the default branch name References: Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:46:56 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:49:04 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 331C79B4-29DF-11EB-89FB-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" writes: > Yet another thing I noticed while working on > https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/762. > > Johannes Schindelin (3): > t2106: adjust style to the current conventions > t2106: make test independent of the current main branch name > t2106: ensure that the checkout fails for the expected reason > > t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh | 31 +++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) This seems to partly replicate and partly deprecate what is in that final stretch 27-or-28 patch series does to the same test script. Are we taking this and then removing a patch or two from that larger series?