From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8181F8C6 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 19:23:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344622AbhIATY0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:24:26 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:58043 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344621AbhIATYZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:24:25 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42210E6403; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:23:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=P9MQCRl3TpTeWbE93N7AVYLATliFGz6rGtIYja PmM48=; b=i+cOtAfxpiI6J0hBBwzlFZggY9jxCb9ZST1bQcoiTo7Ktuidt0jOHj wGLO6tPYvpxPsAyvvI3EoUW8dn4gSx4Rb6UWrQYX+s3f3m2bPTOqKFbDhvecQTmy x71BOEAGJG0j2yMU8s3tI7/Ud9q+VMZ9Tjq7OBkxrTmw9NtQ5Ofew= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398DFE6402; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:23:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.116.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88FAFE63FF; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:23:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, dstolee@microsoft.com, jonathantanmy@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] multi-pack reachability bitmaps References: Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:23:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Taylor Blau's message of "Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:08:25 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 15696B54-0B5A-11EC-88E8-D601C7D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Taylor Blau writes: > I'm comfortable with saying what's written in the documentation, since > even though it happens to work today, we should leave ourselves open to > not supporting directories which aren't alternates. > > But I'm equally OK if you would rather drop this hunk from the > documentation when staging. Oh, no, don't get me wrong. I am comfortable with the documented limitation, as that is what the area experts have agreed that is reasonable given the expected use case. I however am much less comfortable with a documented limitation that we make no attempt to enforce, and that is why the first thing I looked for after seeing the documentation update was new code to make sure we reject a random directory that is not our alternate object store. Thanks.