From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7766B1F953 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 20:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1382909AbhLCUFg (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2021 15:05:36 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:61808 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1353557AbhLCUFd (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2021 15:05:33 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1595EA72F; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 15:02:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=2WF9an2Nk+5j5KR2VXVvP9h/h7EZK7zc5MPtzH EbfKE=; b=JjwmMA3l7qsl7IrCW8VmtcE4h5H3LFZg3zazrCwWfwe2M4pArnD+FS CSRnpXtxqLMuV5XdpSTcO5717cJUCcb4e6N/Nvcg3tsMuw2Fz3fKc2xFDE+B2OQ3 gYaiIN9kv4NqReXktxUQTcbOdBsEFgmCJVLrG6C5mV5NgO/FNZzsI= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9522BEA72C; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 15:02:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35B50EA72B; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 15:02:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: James Limbouris via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, James Limbouris Subject: Re: [PATCH] subtree: fix argument handling in check_parents References: Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 12:02:02 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Fri, 3 Dec 2021 16:22:23 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E2E887F6-5473-11EC-8853-62A2C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > So I _think_ your change is correct, even if I would love to see an > easy-to-understand description of the scenario where more than one parents > might be checked. I agree with this. I'll mark the topic as "Expecting a reroll" in the next "What's cooking" report, so that we do not forget that we are waiting for such an improved description in the log message. Thanks.