From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_CSS,URIBL_CSS_A shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEB81F54E for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 21:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="JU24YgV5"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234904AbiHDVhF (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2022 17:37:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52674 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229627AbiHDVhE (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2022 17:37:04 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9287A6D9CB for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 14:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BE91BF6C0; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 17:37:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=Cv7x6qCXJm8R IpfGrt/89pQ270V8nUQ/XrL75A2d92U=; b=JU24YgV5ucjYUatNR0AnwjmbqK+w hPsdy5oRpwQnWDo49cZlt3EKaZ2duavuMmxBEJ+6GAfVaoEW9rApwEkbE5V6Nfib gkmKoD++4mUPIqH7wPLZg+j2TLvjkxadMvrs2r1aPdXfNr4GiS5WiONfmw5IpKLD CEPe/9etaYnlQrM= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6831BF6BF; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 17:37:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.145.39.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A42EC1BF6BC; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 17:36:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sunshine , Philippe Blain , Derrick Stolee , Taylor Blau , Jeff King , Teng Long Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/12] docs: create & use "(user|developer) interfaces" categories References: Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 14:36:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFybmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Thu, 4 Aug 2022 18:28:29 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 919CE9FC-143D-11ED-9789-CBA7845BAAA9-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > See the v5 for a general overview: > https://lore.kernel.org/git/cover-v5-0.9-00000000000-20220721T160721Z-a= varab@gmail.com/ > > =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason (12): > help.c: refactor drop_prefix() to use a "switch" statement" > help.c: remove common category behavior from drop_prefix() behavior > git help doc: use "" instead of "" > git docs: add a category for user-facing file, repo and command UX > git docs: add a category for file formats, protocols and interfaces > docs: move commit-graph format docs to man section 5 > docs: move protocol-related docs to man section 5 > docs: move index format docs to man section 5 > docs: move signature docs to man section 5 > docs: move pack format docs to man section 5 > docs: move cruft pack docs to gitformat-pack > docs: move http-protocol docs to man section 5 OK, I have to admit that my eyes were a bit too tired to give a fine-toothed-comb review, but between range-diff output and a full reading of the new ones that range-diff did not match with the old round, I did not find anything unexpected. Looking good. Thanks.