From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, URIBL_CSS,URIBL_CSS_A shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460B61F54E for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 21:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="CHaDrblj"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242194AbiHRVie (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:38:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54656 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241023AbiHRVic (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:38:32 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAEC02AC6B for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:38:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAED13B9D1; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:38:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=I4G19/t8sI9w70qcuOxSp4eQA20u+TvUukv2TT HzLi0=; b=CHaDrbljia2kKmzcapEBo+R2aWE7W2GB1SpjIUzPURgtIfTwCm8fBC sy6TcFWO+HkSwdbFPSql5ywulElq0xywA8TJdKPbpogttmRdusRJd1n5f5jhN14k ksNqGdAIsD+bRtRL9iZ41cGDFsh01NMw1qCsJWaGws1DD2n8fC1kc= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230BA13B9D0; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:38:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.5.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C63513B9CF; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:38:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Eric DeCosta Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsmonitor: option to allow fsmonitor to run against network-mounted repos References: Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:38:27 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:35:01 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 18FB5AF4-1F3E-11ED-A483-5E84C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > "Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget" writes: > >> From: Eric DeCosta >> >> Though perhaps not common, there are uses cases where users have large, >> network-mounted repos. Having the ability to run fsmonitor against >> network paths would benefit those users. >> >> As a first step towards enabling fsmonitor to work ... > > Didn't we already see the first step and got it reviewed? I think > I've already merged the last round to 'next'. > > Puzzled... Ah, OK, so this is not exactly the "first step", but builds on top of the previous one? At least the patch needs a better title to make it distinguishable from the other one. Will queue to wait for others to review. Thanks.