From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHv2] Documentation: triangular workflow Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 08:58:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1464697717-5751-1-git-send-email-jordan.de-gea@grenoble-inp.org> <1465206518-1780-1-git-send-email-jordan.de-gea@grenoble-inp.org> <12C5A5F1276946DC99A03F30FEE49559@PhilipOakley> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "Junio C Hamano" , "Jordan DE GEA" , , , , , To: "Philip Oakley" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 07 08:59:06 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bAAyf-0007Th-P4 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 08:59:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753685AbcFGG7A (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 02:59:00 -0400 Received: from mx2.imag.fr ([129.88.30.17]:42654 "EHLO mx2.imag.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752426AbcFGG67 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 02:58:59 -0400 Received: from clopinette.imag.fr (clopinette.imag.fr [129.88.34.215]) by mx2.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u576wjea013210 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 08:58:45 +0200 Received: from anie (anie.imag.fr [129.88.42.32]) by clopinette.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u576wk0I013828; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 08:58:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <12C5A5F1276946DC99A03F30FEE49559@PhilipOakley> (Philip Oakley's message of "Mon, 6 Jun 2016 23:21:14 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (mx2.imag.fr [129.88.30.17]); Tue, 07 Jun 2016 08:58:46 +0200 (CEST) X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact MI2S MIM for more information X-MailScanner-ID: u576wjea013210 X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-IMAG-MailScanner-From: matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1465887529.8914@K9ldj6/bVqr0P1DFAn0l2g Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Philip Oakley" writes: > Given that clarification I'd be happier to go with it being one's > 'Publish' repo. > > My initial reticence was because of the association of "publish" with > vanity publishing and other forms of over-sharing and self promotion. > > A clarification/explanation that calling it a 'publish' repo is about > granting access, and possible open access, would make it more > acceptable. I think "publish" is the best we found up to now. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/