From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ref-filter: add ref-filter API Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 00:33:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: <555C88C2.8060902@gmail.com> <1432127904-21070-2-git-send-email-karthik.188@gmail.com> <555E1CE7.8090507@gmail.com> <555F252C.2060601@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: karthik nayak , git@vger.kernel.org, christian.couder@gmail.com To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 24 00:33:46 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YwHzF-00017u-HY for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 00:33:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752437AbbEWWdl (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 May 2015 18:33:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.imag.fr ([129.88.30.5]:40491 "EHLO shiva.imag.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751000AbbEWWdk (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 May 2015 18:33:40 -0400 Received: from clopinette.imag.fr (clopinette.imag.fr [129.88.34.215]) by shiva.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t4NMXUH3013061 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 24 May 2015 00:33:30 +0200 Received: from anie.imag.fr (anie.imag.fr [129.88.7.32]) by clopinette.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t4NMXXcd016239; Sun, 24 May 2015 00:33:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sat, 23 May 2015 10:18:04 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (shiva.imag.fr [129.88.30.5]); Sun, 24 May 2015 00:33:30 +0200 (CEST) X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact MI2S MIM for more information X-MailScanner-ID: t4NMXUH3013061 X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-IMAG-MailScanner-From: matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1433025212.92191@f83OBuzH/rxOm1ChBsVOmQ Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > And I do not think an array of things that are operated on should > not be named "ref_filter_item". Is the double-negation intended? It seems contradictory with: > Surely, the latter "set of operations to be applied" may currently > be only filtering, but who says it has to stay that way? (With which I do agree) -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/