From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:34:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <9e4733910610140807p633f5660q49dd2d2111c9f5fe@mail.gmail.com> <45357411.20500@utoronto.ca> <200610180246.18758.jnareb@gmail.com> <45357CC3.4040507@utoronto.ca> <4536EC93.9050305@utoronto.ca> <87lkncev90.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <453792A8.1010700@utoronto.ca> <878xjc2qeb.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <453803E6.2060309@utoronto.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 20 14:35:26 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gatan-0007aP-5s for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:35:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751671AbWJTMfN (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:35:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751696AbWJTMfN (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:35:13 -0400 Received: from imag.imag.fr ([129.88.30.1]:41123 "EHLO imag.imag.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751671AbWJTMfL (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:35:11 -0400 Received: from mail-veri.imag.fr (mail-veri.imag.fr [129.88.43.52]) by imag.imag.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9KCYXPT002531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:34:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ecrins.imag.fr ([129.88.43.124]) by mail-veri.imag.fr with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1Gata4-0000LZ-5V; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:34:32 +0200 Received: from moy by ecrins.imag.fr with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Gata4-00048a-20; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:34:32 +0200 To: Jakub Narebski In-Reply-To: (Jakub Narebski's message of "Fri\, 20 Oct 2006 12\:53\:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:34:34 +0200 (CEST) X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact IMAG DMI for more information X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-IMAG-MailScanner-From: moy@imag.fr Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski writes: >> If you're interested, it's called "Bugs Everywhere" and it's available here: >> http://panoramicfeedback.com/opensource/ >> >> New VCS backends are welcome :-D > > While SCM can (and should be usually) distributed, I think that bugtracker > has to be centralized. Well, indeed, I think bug _reporting_ should be somehow centralized, while bug _fixing_ can be decentralized: You fix a bug, you mark it as fixed, and then the main branch gets the information that the bug is fixed when the bugfix is merged. -- Matthieu