Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add test case for dealing with a tracked file in an ignored directory

[Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>]

Greg Brockman <gdb@mit.edu> writes:

>> I don't think you want to complain with "did not match any files"
>> here.
> Well, I copied the behavior of 'git add "*"' here, where every file in
> . is ignored.  E.g.
> """
> $ echo >ignore-file
> $ echo .gitignore >>.gitignore
> $ echo ignore-file >>.gitignore
> $ git add '*'
> fatal: pathspec '*' did not match any files
> """

OK, that makes sense (you can add comments to your tests or commit
message to justify this is case someone wonders later).

> realized today that git globbing seems to act differently depending on
> where the wildcard appears.  E.g.:

> Is this a bug?

There are many known inconsistancies with Git globing, yes. See for
example:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/128672/focus=128759

>> You're not testing the case
>>
>>  git add ignored-dir/
>>
>> which gives another case where Git tries to add files not explicitely
>> given on the command-line. But the correct behavior of this case may
>> be more controversial, so maybe it's indeed better to focus on the
>> other cases.
> A fair point.  I would have thought the behavior here should be
> unchanged, namely that 'git add ignored-dir/' should spit out a "The
> following paths are ignored by one of your .gitignore files: ..."
> error, regardless of the directory's contents.  Does anyone believe
> this should be different/would it be useful for me to draw up a test
> case for it now?  In any case, I'll certainly put a test case for this
> into the final patch.

It makes sense to make "git add dir/" equivalent to "git add dir/*",
but I don't really care either way.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/